Proposed 2007 ToY Rules Public
Posted 10 March 2007 - 12:28 PM
Posted 10 March 2007 - 12:45 PM
This might be a simple answer. Maybe the points could be ditributed in this fashion. If a contest has 29 teams then first place in each category would get 29 points, second place 28 points down to 1 point for last. Same goes with the overall. The more teams there are the more points are available, the bigger contests will create more points, as they should. But everybody gets points, no one is left out. At the end of the year only the top ten in each category and overall will receive TOY awards (except for Rookie and Most Improved or whatever else is decided). You could also keep this as 'in state contests only'. Afterall it is the CBBQA TOY. That is about as easy as it gets.......I think.
I moved this to this page to make sure everyone gets another chance to read it. This is about the easiest way to track points that I can think of.
I agree, I think most improved will have to wait until the end of 2008.
Posted 10 March 2007 - 12:58 PM
Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:25 PM
But I think the point is..... nobody gets left out.
What about in state contests only qualify. It makes it so much easier. Nobody has to report or verify anything from out of state contests. I think it was Ben who mentioned that some people don't have the money and time to travel out of state, so it's not fair to them. Therefore this should make everyone happy(sorry Peter), well almost.
Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:42 PM
We can track everyone at each contest so teams that finishes below 10th can see where they are at. I will need to make sure someone sends me a complete team scoring sheet that is provided at the end of each contest to do it. We will not be at every event, even in CA, due to the costs, but I guess I can do it. I will need to ask for a bumb in my pay!
Posted 10 March 2007 - 01:53 PM
For 2007 scores we could use the KCBS sheets
of the few contests that qualified
As for Out of State I would favor CBBQA Endorsed events be apart of this Boulder,Lake Pleasant maybe a few others are well worth supporting. Endorsement would not be easy to get.
We just need to make every ones California 400 mile circle contain as many contests as possible Yes we would need to look into Oregon also.
Example a No Cal Member would naturally look north as well as south to find events So we have a 400 ish mile circle for him. Out of state members would not have the full circle but at least most of it.
If CBBQA Endorsement is difficult to get we could allow all events to count in the Five Best
The one point per team or NASCAR points style I proposed this last week
First at a 25 team-er is 25 points
First at a 8 team-er is 8 points
We could do away with the 12 team limit
This will make it hard to develop new events
Don't kid yourself that all you have to do is
"Start it and they will come"
Maybe the answer is making it Best of half the qualifying events Team of the Year not Team of a couple of Events
That would put us above five
Posted 10 March 2007 - 02:04 PM
I know Dan Cannon always posts(on his website) full results of every contest in California and then some, usually within days. So you could get your info there also.
Posted 10 March 2007 - 02:26 PM
I will need to ask for a bumb in my pay!
I agree. I think you you should get twice what you have now.
Posted 10 March 2007 - 04:56 PM
I am not following you on the "Its Top Ten over all not Top Ten each meat". Are we having an overall ToY and not a ToY for each meat? I am getting more confused as we discuss each point.
Posted 10 March 2007 - 08:32 PM
Each separate category would be just the 1st place Team
Or is the Top Ten enough?
Posted 15 March 2007 - 06:21 AM
Reminder that public comment remains open for only the next few days then the BoD needs to make some decisions on this.
Posted 15 March 2007 - 07:40 AM
Posted 16 March 2007 - 03:24 PM
Some really like the Nascar style points system (23 teams = 23 points for 1st place, down to last place 1 point), but we are also considering the amount of overhead required to keep those scores accurate.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users